I agree Gary, as I said at the beginning, a little tricky to build.
The way Firestorm did it was to add extra motors to one of the drive shafts. The ring gear was held steady by the main drive motor. A much more elegant solution than the one I came up with!
Anyway, I've made a page with an explanation http://windisch.co.uk/electra/howto/und ... ntials.htm
It might remain vapourware, but it's worth thinking about.
Use of differentials in antweights
Moderators: BeligerAnt, petec, administrator
- Simon Windisch
- Posts: 1806
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 12:00 am
- Location: Reading
- Contact:
- BeligerAnt
- Posts: 1872
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: Brighton
- Contact:
Having discussed this with my mech eng colleagues, it seems I understood better than I thought!
The concensus of opinion is that it is possible (Firestorm demonstrated that) but the BIG problem is powering the motor that is fixed to the diff cage (which rotates). It seems you need some slip-rings or similar and at that point it all gets a bit complicated.
The final nail in the coffin appears to be that the idea doesn't really scale to antweights. To be competitive you would need to achieve all this in about 20g. You would need two motors, plus gearboxes, and the diff and axles. One motor (plus gearbox) would have to be mounted on the diff cage and rotate!
Also, the steering motor is essentially fighting the drive motor. This puts a big load on each motor, so it would be easy to burn either motor out.
As an aside, I just wonder if it is possible to avoid the rotating motor by just driving the right stub-axle (in the photos) with a fixed motor, possibly via a clutch, and almost certainly with some clever differential electronics?
I'm just not sure it actually gains you anything over a standard tank drive system...
The concensus of opinion is that it is possible (Firestorm demonstrated that) but the BIG problem is powering the motor that is fixed to the diff cage (which rotates). It seems you need some slip-rings or similar and at that point it all gets a bit complicated.
The final nail in the coffin appears to be that the idea doesn't really scale to antweights. To be competitive you would need to achieve all this in about 20g. You would need two motors, plus gearboxes, and the diff and axles. One motor (plus gearbox) would have to be mounted on the diff cage and rotate!
Also, the steering motor is essentially fighting the drive motor. This puts a big load on each motor, so it would be easy to burn either motor out.
As an aside, I just wonder if it is possible to avoid the rotating motor by just driving the right stub-axle (in the photos) with a fixed motor, possibly via a clutch, and almost certainly with some clever differential electronics?
I'm just not sure it actually gains you anything over a standard tank drive system...
Gary, Team BeligerAnt
-
- Posts: 3716
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 5:30 pm
- Location: Antrim, Northern Ireland
- Contact:
- Simon Windisch
- Posts: 1806
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 12:00 am
- Location: Reading
- Contact: