Fair enough I guess...
But wait how many times have you actually lost because of the first rule not being applied
Search found 433 matches
- Sat Dec 06, 2014 1:30 pm
- Forum: 2014 AWS Rules Debate
- Topic: 4c 4e
- Replies: 6
- Views: 27034
- Fri Dec 05, 2014 6:57 pm
- Forum: Antweights
- Topic: A new antweighter (again!)
- Replies: 175
- Views: 116716
Re: A new antweighter (again!)
Thanks for the info I will try to get one ready and I might make a new thread when I start building -
Aargh god I can't wait a single second
Aargh god I can't wait a single second
- Fri Dec 05, 2014 8:04 am
- Forum: 2014 AWS Rules Debate
- Topic: Rule 2j - name labels (and typographical error with rule 5e)
- Replies: 21
- Views: 60119
- Thu Dec 04, 2014 10:04 pm
- Forum: 2014 AWS Rules Debate
- Topic: Unstick and postponement rules
- Replies: 10
- Views: 38221
Re: Unstick and postponement rules
If the unstick rule was applied how would it work for a cluster- 1 life for the team or 1 life for each botlet?
- Thu Dec 04, 2014 9:54 pm
- Forum: 2014 AWS Rules Debate
- Topic: Rule 2j - name labels (and typographical error with rule 5e)
- Replies: 21
- Views: 60119
Re: Rule 2j - name labels (and typographical error with rule
As a new antweighter There's probably a very good reason against it but why don't we stick a label on the fighters own side of the arena that's labelled so the commentators and announcers can identify without having written on the robots
- Thu Dec 04, 2014 9:47 pm
- Forum: 2014 AWS Rules Debate
- Topic: Proposed addition to rules
- Replies: 25
- Views: 62589
Re: Proposed addition to rules
Everyone seems to be ignoring the existing rules: 5h) All teams must be self-contained in terms of driver, transmitter, robots and battery packs, i.e. these cannot be shared with another team. I agree and I don't see why this should be altered to say that all drivers must be in the team except thos...
- Tue Dec 02, 2014 5:23 pm
- Forum: Antweights
- Topic: A new antweighter (again!)
- Replies: 175
- Views: 116716
Re: A new antweighter (again!)
Wow I just realised I did this is the wrong section I think I should migrate it to the antweights section
- Tue Dec 02, 2014 5:22 pm
- Forum: Antweights
- Topic: A new antweighter (again!)
- Replies: 175
- Views: 116716
Re: A new antweighter (again!)
The Nano Two's don't have a website. To buy one you email me what you want to rapidrory@gmail.com, I build it, then ship it to you. I would have a website for them, but I only sell straight to other roboteers so don't really want to advertise them more publicly. What are the prices and stats of thi...
- Tue Dec 02, 2014 7:55 am
- Forum: Antweights
- Topic: A new antweighter (again!)
- Replies: 175
- Views: 116716
Re: A new antweighter (again!)
What's the nano two kits website address?
- Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:58 pm
- Forum: Antweights
- Topic: A new antweighter (again!)
- Replies: 175
- Views: 116716
Re: A new antweighter (again!)
Wow thanks guys-I've already built some card models of my ideas
Should I post them?
Also has anyone made a robot called ExuberANT or VigilANTe and r these names any good?
Should I post them?
Also has anyone made a robot called ExuberANT or VigilANTe and r these names any good?