Autonomous Rules

Discussions around autonomous, semi-automatic and intelligent robots and systems.

Moderators: petec, administrator, BeligerAnt

User avatar
Remote-Controlled Dave
Posts: 3716
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Antrim, Northern Ireland
Contact:

Postby Remote-Controlled Dave » Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:37 pm

That's a thought, are there any rules against using the RCX1 at ant events? Apart from the fact they're heavy. Might be a really easy way to enter an auto in an AWS (though not very effective!)
Die Gracefully Robotics
Winner - AWS 39

Adam Hargreaves
Posts: 223
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 9:25 am
Location: Loughborough
Contact:

Postby Adam Hargreaves » Tue Feb 14, 2006 7:18 pm

doesn't look likely that my autonomous one will be ready. Too much to do, too little time...
Team 'In Theory'

User avatar
peterwaller
Posts: 3495
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Aylesbury Bucks
Contact:

Postby peterwaller » Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:33 am

Has anyone considered how we start the robots off especially if they have spinners. I was thinking of including the receiver still so they start of under radio control and then use a spare channel to switch to autonomous on activate. This would also give a way to get them back under control if things don't go quite to plan. The receivers I am using are only about 4.5 gms so it wont make much difference.

User avatar
Remote-Controlled Dave
Posts: 3716
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Antrim, Northern Ireland
Contact:

Postby Remote-Controlled Dave » Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:31 pm

Couldnt you just use a simple servo to turn it on by remote, then it goes off on its own?
Die Gracefully Robotics
Winner - AWS 39

User avatar
BeligerAnt
Posts: 2437
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Brighton
Contact:

Postby BeligerAnt » Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:28 pm

Minisumo bots have to have a start switch and a time delay after the switch is released. I'm not sure this is really good enough for a spinner.

I like the idea of a remote-control override of some description, i.e. the robot shuts down unless a certain R/C channel is at a certain value.
Gary, Team BeligerAnt

josh
Posts: 1115
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: Uxbridge, London
Contact:

Postby josh » Fri Feb 17, 2006 8:19 am

pete dont tell me ur gunna make another spinner!!! :-?

User avatar
olivers
Posts: 1244
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Reading
Contact:

Postby olivers » Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:47 am

Wouldn't it be best for people to build basic autonomous ants first but ban spinners until the basic rules and principles are sorted out.

Once you know if they are IR sensing an opponent, detecting ring-out by white paint around the edge of the arena and so-on then you can put together basic rules.

If I was building an autonomous ant I would aim at 150g 4" cube sensing and getting around the arena first before putting weaponry on it.

My 3p's worth

User avatar
Remote-Controlled Dave
Posts: 3716
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Antrim, Northern Ireland
Contact:

Postby Remote-Controlled Dave » Fri Feb 17, 2006 11:47 am

How could an auto know to avoid the spinning bit of the robot and attack the non-spinning bit anyway? It'd be a massacre!
Die Gracefully Robotics
Winner - AWS 39

User avatar
Flippt
Posts: 607
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Postby Flippt » Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:46 pm

Just like todays ants, without a brain, just pretty good luck.
Image
Swedish style!
Fight Robots, Not Humans!

User avatar
peterwaller
Posts: 3495
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Aylesbury Bucks
Contact:

Postby peterwaller » Fri Feb 17, 2006 4:18 pm

I didn't say I was going to make a spinner just that when working out how we start them off we should take into account spinners. Initially I would think sumo bots will be challenging enough but I am sure if they catch on active weapons will appear sooner or later. Dave it would be possible to have more than one preprogrammed attack sequence that could be selected depending on the opponent.

tom of technology
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:07 pm

Postby tom of technology » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:24 pm

are semi autonimus ants alowed just for and edge detection system because at aws ?? they had a re3ally cool robot bump built by some german guys

User avatar
Flippt
Posts: 607
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Postby Flippt » Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:34 pm

I dont see why not.

And btw, they are Swedish, not German :P
Image

Swedish style!

Fight Robots, Not Humans!

tom of technology
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:07 pm

Postby tom of technology » Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:24 pm

umm oops :oops: :oops: :oops: i meant sweedish :oops:

User avatar
leo-rcc
Posts: 469
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 8:44 am
Location: Hoogvliet, The Netherlands
Contact:

Postby leo-rcc » Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:53 am

What I'd like to know is how this edge protection works when your robot is flying through the air. :)

The idea is cool though.
Best regards,

Leo van Miert.
Dutchrobotgames
Team RCC website

Hogi
Posts: 946
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:47 pm
Location: basingstoke

Re: Autonomous Rules

Postby Hogi » Sat May 04, 2013 2:44 pm

do robots in the mini sumo championship have to be autonomous?
Featherweight under construction.

Antweight to build list: 4Wd lifter, new clusterbot, secret project, walker of some description.

Team Hectic.


Return to “Autonomous and Intelligent Systems”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest